Intraoperative assembly of anatomical shoulder prosthesis frequently results in malalignment of the modular taper junction

Abstract

Anatomical shoulder arthroplasties (ASA) may fail because of micromotion at the modular taper junction causing wear due to fretting. Sufficient taper strength can reduce micromotion and potential reasons for failure. However, there are no normative standards for a safe assembly process performed intraoperatively by the surgeon. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of common intraoperative assembly strategies and to identify critical influencing factors on taper stability. ASA with standard and stemless humeral component in combination with concentric Al2O3 heads and eccentric CoCr28Mo6 alloyed humeral heads were tested. Taper angles and surface roughness were determined. Force magnitudes and impact directions were recorded using a sensorized head impactor and a threedimensional force measuring platform. Subsequently, the axial pull‐off forces were measured and taper engagement areas were macroscopically evaluated. In comparison to standard stem tapers that were impacted with an assembly device, stemless tapers were impacted into the artificial bone with significantly lower forces. Taper strength correlates to maximum impact force and was higher for CoCr28Mo6 heads with a mean pull‐off ratio of 0.56 than for Al2O3 heads with 0.37. Interestingly, all tapers showed an asymmetric clamping behavior, due to tilting during impaction. This is caused by the variation of the resulting force vector and further promoted by humeral head eccentricity. Assembly technique markedly influences the force magnitude, impact direction, impulse, and consequently taper strength. The resulting force vector and head eccentricity were identified as potential risk factors for taper malalignment.