Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117105
Titel: | Diabetes self-management education programs : results from a nationwide population-based study on characteristics of participants, rating of programs and reasons for non-participation |
Autor(en): | Weise, Solveig Du, Yong Heidemann, Christine Baumert, Jens Frese, Thomas Heise, Marcus |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2024 |
Art: | Artikel |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Population-based studies of reasons for not participating in diabetes self-management education (DSME) are scarce. Therefore, we investigated what sociodemographic and disease-related factors are associated with participation in DSME, the reasons for not participating in DSME and how participants evaluate DSME. Research design and methods: We used data from the nationwide survey “Disease knowledge and information needs–Diabetes mellitus 2017”, which included a total of 1396 participants diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (diabetes; n = 394 DSME-participants, n = 1002 DSME-never-participants). Analyses used weighted logistic or multinominal regression analyses with bivariate and multivariable approaches. Results: Participants were more likely to attend DSME if they had a medium (OR 1.82 [95%CI 1.21–2.73]),or high (OR 2.04 [95%CI 1.30–3.21]) level of education, had type 1 diabetes (OR 2.46 [1.24–4.90]) and insulin treatment (OR 1.96 [95%CI 1.33–2.90]). Participants were less likely to attend DSME if they lived in East Germany (OR 0.57 [95%CI 0.39–0.83]), had diabetes for >2 to 5 years (OR 0.52 [95%CI 0.31–0.88] compared to >5 years), did not agree that diabetes is a lifelong disease (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.15–0.62], had never been encouraged by their physician to attend DSME (OR 0.19 [95%CI 0.13–0.27]) and were not familiar with disease management programs (OR 0.67 [95%CI 0.47–0.96]). The main reasons for non-participation were participant’s personal perception that DSME was not necessary (26.6%), followed by lack of recommendation from treating physician (25.7%) and lack of information on DSME (20.7%). DSME-participants found DSME more helpful if they had a medium educational level (OR 2.06 [95%CI 1.10–3.89] ref: low level of education) and less helpful if they were never encouraged by their treatment team (OR 0.46 [95%CI 0.26–0.82]). Discussion: Professionals treating persons with diabetes should encourage their patients to attend DSME and underline that diabetes is a lifelong disease. Overall, the majority of DSME participants rated DSME as helpful. |
URI: | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119065 http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117105 |
Open-Access: | Open-Access-Publikation |
Nutzungslizenz: | (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Journal Titel: | PLOS ONE |
Verlag: | PLOS |
Verlagsort: | San Francisco, California, US |
Band: | 19 |
Heft: | 9 |
Originalveröffentlichung: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0310338 |
Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
journal.pone.0310338.pdf | 2.09 MB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |