Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117095
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLehner, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorLiebau, Arne-
dc.contributor.authorMenzel, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorSchmelzer, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorKnolle, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorScheffler, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorBinder, Wolfgang H.-
dc.contributor.authorPlontke, Stefan K.-R.-
dc.contributor.authorMäder, Karsten-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-11T08:16:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-11T08:16:14Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119055-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117095-
dc.description.abstractDrug delivery to the inner ear presents a unique challenge due to the complex inner ear anatomy and its tight physiological barriers. This study investigates the degradation behavior of intracochlear drug delivery implants (IDDI) composed of dexamethasone and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) or polyethylene glycol–poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PEG-PLGA), respectively. IDDI were incubated in artificial perilymph and implants' degradation kinetics, morphological changes, water uptake behavior, and pH alterations were assessed. Microscopy revealed significant changes in appearance, with PLGA IDDI exhibiting rapid expansion, reaching up to 183 % in diameter and 185 % in length. PEG-PLGA implants showed gradual expansion, reaching a maximum of 178 % in diameter and 144 % in length. Despite these morphological changes, the IDDIs could still be applicable in terms of cochlear dimensions in combination with cochlear implants (CI) in humans or in a domestic pig animal model. Scanning electron microscopy analysis demonstrated surface alterations of PLGA implants, while PEG-PLGA implants remained shape-stable. Gravimetric analysis and gel permeation chromatography revealed distinct degradation profiles, with PLGA implants displaying rapid water uptake and mass loss, while PEG-PLGA implants showed delayed water uptake and minimal mass reduction. pH measurements using the pH-sensitive fluorescent dye SNARF™-1 showed initial pH reduction in artificial perilymph for PLGA implants while PEG-PLGA implants maintained pH stability.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleCharacterization of PLGA versus PEG-PLGA intracochlear drug delivery implants : degradation kinetics, morphological changes, and pH alterationseng
dc.typeArticle-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleJournal of drug delivery science and technology-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume99-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend9-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameEd. de Santé-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceParis-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105972-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1902035046-
cbs.publication.displayform2024-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2024-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-11-11T08:15:52Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in Journal of drug delivery science and technology - Paris : Ed. de Santé, 2004-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1773224724006415-main.pdf6.04 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open