Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117096
Title: Prognostic impact of selection criteria of current adjuvant endocrine therapy trials NATALEE and monarchE in postmenopausal HRpos/HER2neg breast cancer patients treated with upfront letrozole
Author(s): Fasching, Peter AndreasLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Hack, Carolin ChristineLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Nabieva, NaibaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Maass, NicolaiLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Aktaş, BahriyeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Kümmel, SherkoLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Thomssen, ChristophLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Wolf, Christopher
Kolberg, Hans-ChristianLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2024
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: The monarchE and NATALEE trials demonstrated the benefit of CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy in adjuvant breast cancer (BC) treatment. Patient selection, based on clinical characteristics, delineated those at high (monarchE) and high/intermediate recurrence risk (NATALEE). This study employed a historical patient cohort to describe the proportion and prognosis of patients eligible for adjuvant CDK4/6i trials. Methods: Between 2009 and 2011, 3529 patients were enrolled in the adjuvant PreFace clinical trial (NCT01908556). Eligibility criteria included postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos) BC for whom a five-year upfront therapy with letrozole was indicated. Patients were categorized into prognostic groups according to monarchE and NATALEE inclusion criteria, and their invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: Among 2891 HRpos patients, 384 (13.3 %) met the primary monarchE inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 261) qualified due to having ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes. For NATALEE, 915 out of 2886 patients (31.7 %) met the eligibility criteria, with 126 patients (13.7 %) being node-negative. Patients from monarchE with ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes and NATALEE with stage III BC exhibited the poorest prognosis (3-year iDFS rate 0.87). Patients ineligible for the trials demonstrated prognoses similar to the most favorable patient groups within the eligibility criteria. Conclusion: Patient populations eligible for monarchE and NATALEE trials differed. Nearly a third of the postmenopausal HRpos population, previously under upfront letrozole treatment, met the NATALEE prognostic eligibility criteria. As certain eligible groups had a prognosis similar to non-eligible patients, it might be interesting to explore additional patient groups for CDK4/6i therapy.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119056
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117096
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: European journal of cancer
Publisher: Elsevier
Publisher Place: Amsterdam [u.a.]
Volume: 209
Original Publication: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114239
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0959804924008955-main.pdf3.8 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open