Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117065
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeiwerth, Ingmar-
dc.contributor.authorPlößl, Sebastian Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorHerzog, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorSchilde, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorRadetzki, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorKrämer, Steffen-
dc.contributor.authorRahne, Torsten-
dc.contributor.authorPlontke, Stefan K.-R.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T08:25:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-07T08:25:34Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117065-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The simultaneous implantation of the Bonebridge (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), a semi-implantable active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device and anchors for auricular prostheses can be challenging as both implants contain magnets and compete for the narrow space in the designated implantation area. Material and methods: A preoperative planning tool (virtual surgery) was used with individual 3D computer models of the skull and implants for finding optimal implant positions for both the floating mass transducer (FMT) and the anchors for the auricular prosthesis. The interaction between the magnetic prosthesis anchors and the FMT was measured by means of static magnetic forces. A retrospective data analysis was conducted to evaluate the surgical and audiological outcome. Results: Between 2014 and 2021, a 3D planning of a simultaneous implantation of the Bonebridge with auricular prosthesis anchors was conducted on 6 ears of 5 patients (3 males, 2 females; age range 17–56 years). The individual preoperative planning was considered very useful for the optimal placement of bone anchors in combination with the Bonebridge. Audiological data showed a clear benefit for hearing 3 months and >11 months after implantation. No adverse interactions between the magnetic prosthesis anchors and the FMT were observed. In two patients, revision surgery was carried out due to skin inflammation or wound healing problems. No long-term complications were observed 3–5 years after surgery. Conclusion: Preoperative 3D planning represents a clear benefit for the simultaneous audiological and esthetic rehabilitation using the Bonebridge and anchors for auricular prostheses.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610-
dc.titleIndividual computer-assisted 3D planning for placement of auricular prosthesis anchors in combination with an implantable transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device in patients with aural atresiaeng
dc.typeArticle-
dc.title.translatedIndividuelle computergestützte 3D-Planung zur Platzierung von Epithesenankern in Kombination mit einem implantierbaren transkutanen Knochenleitungshörgerät bei Patienten mit Ohrfehlbildungen-
local.versionTypepublishedVersion-
local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleHNO-
local.bibliographicCitation.volume71-
local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1-
local.bibliographicCitation.pageend9-
local.bibliographicCitation.publishernameSpringer-
local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplaceBerlin-
local.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1007/s00106-022-01190-w-
local.openaccesstrue-
dc.identifier.ppn1871582741-
cbs.publication.displayform2023-
local.bibliographicCitation.year2023-
cbs.sru.importDate2024-11-07T08:24:59Z-
local.bibliographicCitationEnthalten in HNO - Berlin : Springer, 1996-
local.accessrights.dnbfree-
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00106-022-01190-w.pdf4.94 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open